coder r Search Results


90
ATLAS.ti version 1.0.50
Version 1.0.50, supplied by ATLAS.ti, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/pmc06093431-167-9-8?v=ATLAS.ti
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
version 1.0.50 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MathWorks Inc benchmark
Benchmark, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/amir_maral__2019__design_space_exploration_in_cyber_physical_systems-118-32-34?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
benchmark - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MathWorks Inc embedded coder
Embedded Coder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/10__1016_slash_j__ifacol__2016__12__015-202-1-0?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
embedded coder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BioInvent n-coder scfv
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
N Coder Scfv, supplied by BioInvent, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/pmc07526549-137-3-3?v=BioInvent
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
n-coder scfv - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MathWorks Inc matlab code
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Matlab Code, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/pm40259140-80-15-15?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab code - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MathWorks Inc hdlcoder
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Hdlcoder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/us12437542-347-34-37?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hdlcoder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATLAS.ti inter-coder agreement tool
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Inter Coder Agreement Tool, supplied by ATLAS.ti, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/ppr0461248-67-1-5?v=ATLAS.ti
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inter-coder agreement tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
qsr international nvivo software
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Nvivo Software, supplied by qsr international, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/10__1200_slash_jop__2013__001203-47-14-16?v=qsr+international
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nvivo software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
VERBI Software GmbH maxqda
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Maxqda, supplied by VERBI Software GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/10__1002_slash_tea__21949-194-9-12?v=VERBI+Software+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
maxqda - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
YANACO Inc chn coder mt-5 analyzer
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Chn Coder Mt 5 Analyzer, supplied by YANACO Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/pm39599258-82-10-14?v=YANACO+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chn coder mt-5 analyzer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
YANACO Inc cn coder mt700
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Cn Coder Mt700, supplied by YANACO Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/10__2965_slash_jwet__23___071-96-2-5?v=YANACO+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cn coder mt700 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SUZUKEN CO LTD life coder ex r
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Life Coder Ex R, supplied by SUZUKEN CO LTD, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/coder+r/pmc06096027-131-10-14?v=SUZUKEN+CO+LTD
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
life coder ex r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an scFv library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.

Journal: JCI Insight

Article Title: LILRB3 (ILT5) is a myeloid cell checkpoint that elicits profound immunomodulation

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.141593

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an scFv library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.

Article Snippet: In panning 1, BioInvent n-CoDeR scFv were selected using biotinylated in-house–produced recombinant LILRB3-hFc fusion proteins (captured with streptavidin-coated Dynabeads, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with or without competition or LILRB1-hFc coated onto etched polystyrene balls (Polysciences) or plastic immunotubes.

Techniques: Transfection, Generated, Clone Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Binding Assay, Control, High Throughput Screening Assay, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Staining, Stable Transfection, Labeling, Expressing